FACTORS AFFECTING BUDGETARY ALLOCATION PROCESS IN PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS IN NEPAL; CASE OF THE NATIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION
Abstract
The public administration environment is becoming increasingly complex and there is also an increasing need to align society needs with the limited available resources. This requires that funds that are made available be used for the purpose which they were provided for. In Nepal fiscal policy in macroeconomic management has continued to be a complex area and is often characterized by increasing inflation and interest rates, budget deficits, low economic growth rates and a rising debt burden. This study sought to establish factors affecting budgetary allocation process in public institutions in Nepal. A case study research design was used for the current study. The target population was 309 employees of Nepal Government. Stratified random sampling will be used in selection of sample size. This study sampled 156 employees. The study collected both primary and secondary data. Primary data was gathered using semi-structured questionnaires. Descriptive analysis was used, which included the use of weighted means, standard deviation, relative frequencies and percentages. Tables and other graphical presentations were appropriately used to present the data that was collected for ease of understanding and analysis. The study revealed that citizen participation positively affect budgetary allocation process to a great extent and that regular citizen monitoring helps to identify changing patterns or circumstances that need corrective action. The study noted that active citizen participation in the budgetary allocation process helps in effective allocation of the county resources. The study also revealed that political interference affects budgetary allocation process to a great extent and that members of the County Assembly (MCAs) have a great control over the budgetary process at the county level.
Keywords: Citizen Participation, Political Interference, Legal Framework, Budget Review and Budgetary Allocation Process
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allen, F.G., Garrity, J.R., and Schiavo-Campo, B.S. (2004). Government Revenues and Expenditures in Guinea-Bissau: Causality and Cointegration, World Bank Group Africa Region Working Paper Series No. 65.
Aregbeyen, S. & Baba, L. (2013). Causal Linkages between Government Revenue and Spending: Evidence from Ghana. Bank of Ghana Working Paper, WP/BOG-2013/13.
Eising. W (2013). Reforming Local authorities for better service delivery in developing countries. Institute of Policy analysis and Research. Nepal.
Barro, R, J. (1974) “Are Government Bonds Not Wealth?†Journal of Political Economy, Nov.-Dec.1095-1118.
Brookson, S. (2000). Managing budgets. Wing King Tong Co. Ltd. Singapore
Chang, T. (2009). Revisiting the Government Revenue-Expenditure Nexus: Evidence from 15 OECD Countries based on the Panel Data Approach‟. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, (59)2,165-172.
Darrat, A. (1998), "Budget balance through spending cuts or tax adjustments? ", Contemporary Economic Policy, (20)3,221-230.
Fisher, A., Laing, J., & Stoeckel, J. (1983). A handbook for family planning operations research design. New York: The population Council.
Friedman, M. (1978). The Limitations of Tax Limitation. Policy Review, (5)78, 7-14.
Ho, A. T. (2011). PBB in American Local Governments: It’s More than a Management Tool. Public Administration Review, (5)6, 391-401.
Hondroyiannis, G. & Papapetrou, E. (1996), "An examination of the causal relationship between government spending and revenue: A cointegration analysis", Public Choice, (89)3, 4, 363-374.
Hou, Y., Lunsford, R. S., Sides, K. C., & Jones, K.A. (2011). State Performance-Based Budgeting in Boom and Bust Years: An Analytical Framework and Survey of the States. Public Administration Review, (5)6, 370-388.
Jordan, M. M., & Hackbart, M. M. (1999). Performance Budgeting and Performance Funding in the States: A Status Assessment. Public Budgeting & Finance, (19) ,68-88.
Klase, K. A. & Dougherty, M. J. (2008). The Impact of Performance Budgeting on State Budget Outcomes, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 20 (3), 277-298.
Kluvers, R. (2001). An Analysis of Introducing Program Budgeting in Local Government. Public Budgeting and Finance, 21(2), 29–45.
Kombo.K.D and Tromp.L.A, (2006) Proposal and Theisis Writing, Don Bosco Printing Press, Nepal.
Kothari, C.R (2006) Research Methodology: Methods and techniques, (1st Ed), New Age international publishers.
Lee, Yun-jie J and Wang, X. (2009). Assessing the Impact of Performance-Based Budgeting: A Comparative Analysis across the United States, Taiwan, and China. Public Administration Review, 12, 60-66.
Levin, R.I. and Rubin, D.S. (2008). Statistics for Management, (7th Ed.). Prentice Hall.
Meltzer, K and Richards, H (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy 89 (5): 914-927.
Musgrave, R. (Ed) (1966), Principles of budget determination, Random House, New York.
Nkanata, E.K. (2012). The factors affecting the government spending of the budget allocations by the accounting officers in Nepal. An unpublished MBA project. Nepaltta University.
Peacock, A.T. & Wiseman, J. (1961). The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pretorius M and Pretorius , J : (2008). Critical variables of business failure: A review and classification framework. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences (SAJEMS), 11(4), 408-430.
Rosen, S. (2002). An Examination of Revenue and Expenditure Causality in Bangladesh: 1974-2004. Bangladesh Bank of Policy Analysis Unit Working Paper Series WP 0605.
Rosen, S. (2002). An Examination of Revenue and Expenditure Causality in Bangladesh: 1974-2004. Bangladesh Bank of Policy Analysis Unit Working Paper Series WP 0605.
Ustawi (2013).Controller of Budget under the New Constitution. Ustawi. Retrieved April 8, 2015, from www.ustawi.info.ke/index.php/government/commissions-and-independent offices/controller-of-budget.
Von Furstenberg, G.M., Green, R.J. and Jeong, J.H. (1986). Tax and Spend or Spend and Tax? Review of Economics and Statistics, (68)2,179-188.
Wahid, A.N.M. (2008), "An Empirical Investigation on the Nexus between Tax Revenue and Government Spending: The Case of Turkey", International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, (16)46-51.
Willoughby , K and Melkers, C. (2000). Cost and management accounting. International Thomson Business Press London.
Witt, S. & Muller, Y. (2006). The Revenue-Expenditure Nexus: The Experience of 13 African Countries. African Development Review, (20)2,273-283.
Wolde , T., and Rufael, Y. (2008). The Revenue-Expenditure Nexus: The Experience of 13 African Countries. African Development Review, (20)2,273-283.
World Bank (2008). Public Financial Management Reforms in Post-Conflict Countries: Synthesis Report. Washington D.C.: World Bank.
World Bank. (2012). Devolution without Disruptions – Pathways to a successful New Nepal Poverty Reduction Economic Management unit South Asia, Nepal.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.