INFLUENCE OF APPRAISAL FEEDBACK ON EMPLOYEE PRODUCTIVITY AT WATER AND SEWERAGE COMPANY GARISSA COUNTY
Abstract
In Kenya, performance appraisal has been adopted in both private and public firms as an instrument for performance enhancement. This study tried to determine the influence of appraisal feedback on employee productivity at water and sewerage company Garissa County. The study was moored on systems theory. The study targeted 115 laborers chosen from the accompanying offices: human resources, money, data innovation, specialized help and client administration. The respondents incorporated heads of offices, area heads and managers. The study utilized a descriptive research design. Information gathered was coded, entered and broken down utilizing the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Descriptive and Inferential insights were utilized, to sum up, the populace. The descriptive results indicated an agreement with the statements on management by objectives, evaluation, performance appraisal design and 360 degrees appraisal method. The study concluded that; Appraisal feedback was provided to employees by their managers. The organization found it easy to share positive and adequate feedback regarding performance as compared to criticizing poor performance. Appraisal standards have a positive influence on the employee productivity of an organization. The study recommended that; the study recommends that water and sewerage companies should have well laid down procedures to be followed in dealing with employees’ feedback and responding to the feedback from its surrounding. The study recommends that the Federation of Kenyan Employees (FKE) should formulate procedures and policies to be used in the identification of employees’ standards.
Keywords: Appraisal feedback, Employee Productivity
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aguinis, H. (2009). To control, manage results (2nd ed.). The Pearson Prentice Corridor of Upper Seat Stream, NJ.
Banket, R.D. (2011). Contextual analysis of performance impacts of outcome-based incentive compensation. Academy of Management journal, 39(4), 920-948.
Brown, M., & Benson, J. (2013). Don’t interrupt me! An examination of the relationship between intrusions at work and employee strain. International Journal of Stress Management, 20(2), 77.
Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2008). Business Exploration Strategies (9 th version). USA: McGraw-Slope.
Dzinkowski, R. (2010). The assessment of insightful capital. The Journal of Business System.
Gail Steptoe-Warren (2013), Word related brain research an applied methodology.
Hartzell, D. (2008). Word reference of The board. New Delhi: Academic Distributers
Helfat, C. E., & Winter, S. G. (2011). Reflexivity and the History of Psychology. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology.
Heere, B., & Xing, X. (2012). BOCOG's road to success: predictors of commitment to organizational success among Beijing Olympic employees. European Sport Management Quarterly, 12(2), 161-181
Hinkin, H. & Schriesheim, E. (2012). The headway of information systems: their impact on affiliations and developments.
Jackson, S. & Schuller, R. (2012). Administering HR through Fundamental Association (eighth ed.).
Jäger, A., Loschelder, D.D. & Friese, M. (2015). How self-guideline assists with dominating arrangement challenges: an outline, mix, and standpoint. European Survey of Social Brain research, 26(1), 203–46.
Jan, S., Israr, M., Haq, Z., Tariq, M., & Jahangir, M. (2014). The impact of execution The executives framework on educator's proficiency: A contextual analysis of non-public schools in area Peshawar. Life Science Journal; 11(4),79-85.
Jorgenson, B., Eisenberger, K., Rhoades, G. & Cameron, B. (2014). Moving from Perception to Activity: A Control Hypothesis Viewpoint. Applied Brain research, 43(4), 335-398.
Klein, H. J., Wesson, M. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Alge, B. J. (1999). Objective responsibility and the objective setting measure: calculated explanation and exact blend. Journal of Applied Brain research, 84, 885-896.
Macky, K.,& Johnson, G. (2000). The vital Administration of HR in New Zealand. Auckland, New Zealand: Irwin/McGraw-Slope.
Mugenda, O., & Mugenda, A. (2003). Exploration Strategies: Subjective and Quantitative Methodologies. Nairobi: Africa Place for Innovation Studies.
Nik Chmiel (2009). A prologue to work and hierarchical brain research, (second release), Blackwell Distributing Ltd.
Solmon, D. & Podgursky, C. (2010). Worker The executives pratices Practices of World Vision: Ghana Country Water Task (GRWP). A Postulation Submitted to the College of Cape Coast.
TolI, A., Webb, T.L. & Hardy, G.E. (2016). Does shaping usage aims help individuals with psychological wellness issues to accomplish objectives? A meta-examination of test concentrates with clinical and simple examples. English Journal of Clinical Brain research, 55(1),69–90.
Tyson, S. & York, A. (2000). Fundamentals of HR The board. fourth Release. Oxford: Jordan Slope.
Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2008). Instruments of execution goal impacts: The part of objective expectations, self-viability, and availability of plan segments. English Journal of Social Brain research, 47, 373-395.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.