INFLUENCE OF PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT ON ORGANISATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES IN KENYA
Abstract
In competitive markets, a firm has to constantly adapt, update its offering and improve its market share to maintain or improve its position. The study’s main objective was to investigate the influence of product development strategy on the organizational performance of public universities in Kenya. The study was grounded on the resource based view theory and the structure-conduct-performance framework. The study employed a cross sectional survey design involving the total population (census) of the 33 public universities in Kenya. The cross sectional survey design was used because of the comparative analysis across the public universities in Kenya. The cross sectional survey also helped to prove and/or disprove assumptions. The respondents were staff from marketing, planning and strategy, finance and administration departments of the universities. Data was collected through semi-structured research questionnaires, which were self-administered to the respondents with the assistance of the researcher. They were dropped and picked from the respective respondents. Data was analyzed through descriptive statistics and inferential statistics including regression analysis and correlation to establish the potential relationship between the dependent and independent variables. The study findings were presented through frequency distribution tables. The study found that product development has a positive influence on the performance of public universities. Public universities have process innovation through parallel-programs that promotes customer acquisition as well as product replacement programs such as distance learning and virtual leaning to reach out to distance students. Public universities should established academic exchange programs with international universities for boosting positive word of mouth as only a few universities have established the exchange programs.
Key Words; Product Development, Performance
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ansoff, I. (1957). Strategies for Diversification, Juta and Co. Ltd. London, Prentice Hall.
Ansoff, I. (1965). Corporate Strategy. McGraw Hill, New York London, Prentice Hall.
Ansoff, I. (1987). Conceptual underpinnings of systematic strategic management. European Journal of operational research
Atkinson, A.A., Kaplan, R.S., Matsumura, E.M., Young, S.M., (2013). Management Accounting, 6th Ed. New Jersey, NJ: Pearson Education
Bain, J. (1951). The Relation of profit Rate to Industry Concentration, American Manufacturing, 1936-1940, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.65 (3), pp.293-324.
Battaglia, M. P. (2013). Non-ProbabilitySampling. Encyclopedia of Survey Resesrch Methods. 2008. SAGE Publications, 1-4.
Boone, T. (2013). Exploring the Link between Product and Process Innovation in Services: New Service Design. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.
Bourne Mike, Franco Monica, Wilkes John, (2003) "Corporate performance management", Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 7 Issue: 3, pp.15-21.
Cotugno, M., & Stefanelli, V. (2012). Geographical and product diversification during instability financial period: Good or bad for banks? International ResearchJournal of Finance and Economics, 85(3) 87-100
Deeds, D.L., and Coombs, J. (2000) “Dynamic capabilities and new product development in high technology ventures: An empirical analysis of new biotechnology firmsâ€. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(3), pp. 211-229.
Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Yost, K. (2002). Global Diversification, Industrial Diversification, and Firm Value. Journal of Finance.
Deschamps, J. P. & Nayak, P. R. (2014).Product Juggernauts, New York: Harvard Business School Press.
Gakure, M. & Orwa, J. (2014). Sensitization Training Manual on Performance Contracting in Public Service: Performance contract steering committee. Journal of Business and Management, 14 (6): 73-82
Geroski, P, M., Machin, S.and Reenen, J. (2013). The Profitability of Innovating Firms. Rand Journal of Economics24(2):198–211.
Gonenc, H., & Aybar, B. (2006). Financial Crisis and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Turkey. Corporate Governance: An International Review.
Government Of Kenya, (2015), Ministry of Education. The Kenya national examination council Act. Government Printer.
Harzing, A.W. (2014). An empirical analysis and extension of the Bartlett and Ghoshal typology of multinational companies, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 31 No.1, pp.101-20.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2014). Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part I. Accounting Horizons, 15(1), 87-104.
Kaplan. R.S & Norton.D.P (2014). The Balanced score card: Translating Strategy into Action.Harvard Business Review.
Kotler, P. & Zaltman G. (2013). Social marketing: An approach to planned change, Journal of Marketing, 35(3): 3-12
Mboga, L. O. (2013). Marketing strategies and customer service quality: a case of Kenya power and lighting company (Master’s Thesis). University of Nairobi
Njuguna, S. (2006). The Effect of Mergers and Acquisitions on the Financial Performance of Petroleum Firms in Kenya. Unpublished Master of Science in Finance Thesis. University of Nairobi.
Nyoike, C. W. (2015). Expansion strategies used by standard chartered bank to enhance competitive advantage in East African market (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).
Porter, M. (1998). Competitive Strategy. Boston: The Free Press.
Robson, C. (2013). Real World Research . A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers. (2nd Ed.)
Thompson, A.A & Strickland, A.J. (2013). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases. (12th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.